/ Platforms / Uncategorized

YOU CALL THAT A PLATFORM RE-PRICE? AJ BELL YOUINVEST FLASHES ITS NEW CHARGES

It was only a few days ago that I turned to one of my colleagues (I can’t remember who it was. It doesn’t matter, it’s not that great an anecdote and there’s at least a 50% chance I’m making it up anyway.) and complained that there’s not been a re-price in the direct-to-consumer market for ages now. Well, it seems like someone out there was listening to my prayers. And in other news, I’m utterly sick of neither winning the lottery nor Jennifer Lawrence returning my calls.

Anyhoo, this is just my whimsical way of introducing the news that the boys and girls at AJ Bell Youinvest have not only fundamentally changed its pricing structure but also instantly rendered the pricing tables in our recent D2C guide obsolete. BOOM!

New fund switching charges, new core platform charges, new admin charges, new pension income charges. Whoah there! There’s so much going on Steve, where do we even start? Let’s fire all the main changes into a table and try and get a handle on things.

BellTable

Righto, lets have a look in turn:

  • The removal of the 0.20% + £200 cap appears at first glance to be a biggie. We all know that 0.25% is bigger than 0.20%, yeah? Especially when it’s capped at £200. However, it’s important to note that this £200 pa cap applied per wrapper. So, if you had a chunky ISA, GIA and pension, then charges were actually capped at £600, see? Important point to make before reaching too readily for the price hike pitchforks.
  • No getting around the fact that the addition of a new custody charge for shares (and by shares, we mean equities, ETFs, investment trusts et al) will cause a grumble or two. There is now a charge where there wasn’t one before and fundamentally, that’s a difficult message if you’re solely invested there with no fund holdings. However, some of this is offset
  • If you have a pension and have just seen your annual admin charge disappear. Especially if your SIPP is over £20k where this charge used to be a hundred quid a year. Also further offset if.
  • You were in drawdown but not taking an income (i.e. had taken tax free cash but not regular income yet) where your £50 + VAT charge for this has now been quashed.
  • The reduction from £4.95 to £1.50 in fund switching charges is a welcome change. It won’t make anyone rich, because (1) arithmetic and (2) switching activity on the fund side is low, but is still a nice little alteration.
  • Lastly, the pension lump charges seemed a bit zesty to us so it’s cool to see them come down substantially too.

So, how does this all affect our pricing tables? Let’s look at SIPP products on the fund side first. (Core platform charges + annual admin charges + 2 buys and 2 sells where providers charge.)

SIPP charges

And ISA/GIA (same assumptions)

BellISA

Shares have feelings too so here’s how investment in exchange traded instruments through a general account with 12 trades per year looks. We always illustrate this one in pounds only as it highlights that the majority don’t charge a %-based custody charge for equities.

Shares_Bell_New

Now that’s an awful lot of information to digest. Ultimately, where you stand on this depends on your perspective. With our provider hat on, if you’re looking to change prices you either make a strategic shift here or there, some customers win/lose but most stay pretty much as they were, or you make a fundamental change that affects pretty much everyone. That’s what Youinvest has done here in an attempt to simplify things across the board and it’s a bold move.

Through the lens of the customer, we can see from the heatmaps that Youinvest has retained its position as a low cost provider pretty much across the board, with pension customers at the lower end among the biggest winners, which we like. So for Youinvest, it’s more about managing the messages[1] on the fringes for those affected in the other direction. All the heatmaps in the world aren’t going to comfort a customer who sees their charges demonstrably increase for the same service. We think, overall, there’s more to like than dislike about the new structure but ultimately, it’s over to the customer. What do you think? Drop us a line, we’d love to hear your views.

TL; DR

Lots of price changes. Youinvest still inexpensive on average. If you invest in funds only then your charges are going up a bit, but if you have a modest pot with a pension then they could well be going down. If you’re in drawdown, then you might well save a bit as some of the admin charges are reducing. If you invest in shares, then you’re facing an additional custody charge that is only really significant if you have a biggish pension pot (but is offset by the removal of the main wrapper admin charge) Phew.

[1] It’s launched a calculator for customers who want to see where they stand. Get it here.

/ Blogs

HomeGame 4 – complete!

Thank you to all of those who made it to our beautiful venue at Patina in Edinburgh and to those who joined us online! There will be more content available

Impact of poor service

/ White papers

The Impact of Poor Service

We provided the research for a report, in conjunction with Parmenion, which reveals how far short of expectations many adviser platforms are falling. The research found that over the last 12 months, 88% of advisers needed to apologise to at least one of their clients on behalf of a platform, and that poor service delivery from platforms impacts 91% of advisers every day.

Impact of poor service

/ White papers

The Impact of Poor Platform Service

We provided the research for a report, in conjunction with Parmenion, which reveals how far short of expectations many adviser platforms are falling. The research found that over the last 12 months, 88% of advisers needed to apologise to at least one of their clients on behalf of a platform, and that poor service delivery from platforms impacts 91% of advisers every day.

/ White papers

Answering the Call

Service means a lot of things to a lot of different people. It’s so subjective it can be hard to put your finger on. This paper aims to challenge the status quo and inertia that’s built up in the sector for many years.